At What Point Can We Actually Consider It To Be Cheating..?

As the world of professional cycling is continuously tarnished by 'drug cheats' surely you have to ask yourself, if everyone's doing it at what point is at actually cheating? Yes ok, we know it's against the rules therefore we know it must be considered cheating but if EVERYONE is doing it then is it cheating? Or is it simply becoming the norms of professional cycling

After reading former U.S Postal Service rider and Lance Armstrong's team mate, Tyler Hamilton's book 'The Secret Race' it became clear that exactly what I and everyone else was thinking was in fact true. Anyone who's anyone on the professional cycling circuit is doping. It's just the way it is in the modern era. But in this case, if everyone is actually doping then can we really consider it cheating? 'The Secret Race' highlighted several important points for me: Firstly, and gold medal to me for stating the obvious, Lance Armstrong doped. He denied it throughout his entire career, but he did in fact dope. Secondly, Lance bullied a lot of his team mates into doping, including author Tyler Hamilton who also denied it for a long time before coming clean on a television interview several years later. Thirdly, the lengths that Lance and several other riders went to to ensure they would not be caught and would get the appropriate drugs from the best doctors in the world was beyond extreme. This highlights to me and to every other cycling enthusiast there is, that the world of professional cycling simply will not change. They can't police every single rider to the highest level, A because they are just too good at ensuring they can't be detected with drugs in their system, and B because if they did manage to uncover every rider who doped, there would probably be less than 30 riders left in the field (The Secret Race, Tyler Hamilton, Pg.177, 2012).

Taking all of this into account, lets get back to my question; At What Point Can It Actually Be Considered Cheating? In technical terms of course it's cheating. The rules state that it is against the rules set down by the UCI and enforced by USADA that riders cannot be aided by the use of steroids, blood transfusions or any other form of performance enhancing drugs. (The Secret Race, Tyler Hamilton, Pg.78, 2012). BUT; As this is now becoming the norms of professional cycling, maybe we should just let them be? Maybe we should just accept the fact that over 75% of professional cyclers dope? Maybe we should just let them be, and let them continue to do what they do, and we'll find out who the best of the 'cheats' is every year? Or we'll just find out who has the best doctor. Either way, the world of professional cycling will not change, and with cyclists covering their tracks so much better now it is becoming even harder to detect these drugs, so maybe we should just let them go at it? In 2005, the last time Lance Armstrong won le Tour de France, if they stripped every rider who doped of their respective results and awarded 1st place to the next clean rider, the rider would've come in 23rd place. That shows the extent to which professional cyclists are doping more and more in the modern era, and this number is not going to drop, it will only go up as cyclists realise they simply cannot compete at the top level and keep up with every other rider unless they are doping. This unfortunately is the realism of professional cycling. Maybe it is time for everyone to accept it as a necessary part of cycling?